Is Vitamin C Good For Bone Healing

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the impact of oral vitamin C supplementation on the post-procedural recovery of orthopedic patients, including functional outcomes and complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I). Literature search using the Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception till March 2021 identified seven eligible randomized controlled trials with 1,361 participants. Forest plot revealed no significant difference in the functional outcomes at 6–12 months [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.00, 95% CI − 0.19 to 0.18, 467 patients], risk of overall complications (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.39, 426 patients), and pain severity at 3–6 months (SMD = − 0.18, 95% CI − 0.49 to 0.12, 486 patients) between patients with and without oral vitamin C supplementation. Pooled analysis showed that vitamin C treatment reduced the risk of CRPS I regardless of dosage (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.85, 1143 patients). In conclusion, the current meta-analysis demonstrated that oral vitamin C supplementation may reduce the risk of complex regional pain syndrome type I but did not improve the functional outcomes in orthopedic patients. Nevertheless, because of the small number of trials included in the present study, further large-scale clinical studies are warranted to support our findings.

Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are natural byproducts of normal metabolism, play an important role in homeostasis and cell signaling¹. Although the production of ROS is regulated by antioxidant defense systems under normal physiological conditions², excessive ROS generation and/or weakened antioxidant defense ability causes protein oxidation, lipid peroxidation, and nucleic acid oxidation³. Previous studies have revealed an essential role of ROS in inflammatory and neuropathic pain for which ROS scavengers showed potent antinociceptive effect⁴. Indeed, ROS have been implicated in many chronic pain conditions in clinical practice, including fibromyalgia⁵ and complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I)⁶. Besides the association with skeletomuscular pain, ROS are known to adversely affect bone healing. An imbalance between ROS production and antioxidant defense systems⁷ results in oxidative stress that may be detrimental to healing after bone fracture⁸. In concert with this finding, a previous study reported acceleration of bone healing following long-bone fixative surgery through antioxidant vitamins A, E, and C as well as selenium administration⁹. In addition, previous studies have demonstrated an association between oxidative damage and age-related decline in skeletal muscle functional activity^10,11.

Vitamin C (i.e., ascorbic acid), which is a water-soluble antioxidant and co-substrate of a large class of enzymes crucial for normal human growth and development¹², is known to regulate gene expression through interacting with important transcription factors. Vitamin C is important for coping with all stressful conditions linked to inflammatory processes in which immunity is involved¹³. It is indispensable for collagen formation and bone development. In fact, vitamin C has a part to play in the formation of non-collagenous proteins and the development of cells (i.e., chondroblast, osteogenic, and mesenchymal) in the process of bone healing^14,15. Vitamin C deficiency is known to delay healing after bone fractures¹⁶ and a higher dietary vitamin C intake is related to a reduction in femoral neck bone mineral density loss¹⁷. Consistently, several epidemiological^18,19 and review²⁰ studies have identified a positive association between bone mineral density and dietary vitamin C intake.

Despite the common belief that oxidative damage may be associated with chronic pain and impair the functional integrity of human skeletal muscle as well as bone healing⁸, the impact of vitamin C supplementation on functional outcomes in orthopedic patients remains unclear. Furthermore, there were ambiguous results from meta-analysis^{21,22,23,24,25} regarding the impact of vitamin C supplementation on CRPS I. The present meta-analysis aimed at assessing the impact of vitamin C supplementation on functional outcomes and updating the knowledge of the association of vitamin C supplementation with the risk of CRPS 1 in orthopedic patients.

Materials and methods

Guidelines and registration

This meta-analysis was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines²⁶. The review protocol was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (Registration No. CRD42020207721).

Search strategy

Two authors (K.-C.H., C.-N.H.) independently searched the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated the clinical outcomes in orthopedic patients with and without vitamin C supplementation. The last search was performed on March 27, 2021. To identify relevant articles, search keywords used controlled vocabulary (MeSH or Emtree) and text words including: "bone fracture*" or "fracture*" or "orthopedic*" or "orthopaedic*" or "bone injury" or "fracture healing" or "bone healing" or "bone*" or "Fractures, Bone [MeSH]" or "Orthopedic Procedures [MeSH]" or "Orthopedics [MeSH]" or "vitamin C" or "L-Ascorbic" or "Ascorb*" or "vit c" or "Magnorbin" or "hybrin" or "ascorbic acid [MeSH]". Results were combined using the Boolean operator "AND" with the search terms. References from relevant studies were searched to find additional studies. No publication date was applied, but only trials published in English were included.

Selection criteria

Two reviewers (K.-H.C., L.-K.W.) independently examined the abstracts of the acquired articles to identify potentially eligible studies. The PICO criteria for eligibility of RCTs for the current study included: 1) Population: adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years) who had orthopedic disorders that were treated conservatively or surgically; 2) Intervention: vitamin C was given as an intervention rather than a control through oral or intravenous route; 3) Comparison: placebo or no therapy; and 4) Outcome: any outcomes such as risk of CRPS I and/or functional outcomes (i.e., ≥ 3 months). There were no restrictions on the timing of administration and dosage. The exclusion criteria were (1) non-RCT studies including before-and-after studies, (2) studies that focused on pediatric population because of the difficulty in outcome assessment, (3) those in which information regarding dosage of vitamin C or outcomes was unavailable, and (4) those adopted vitamin C as a placebo. Two authors (J.-Y.C., Y.-J.C.) independently investigated the selected trials for the final analysis. In the situation of disagreements, a third author (C.-K.S.) was involved until a consensus was reached.

Data extraction

Two authors (S.-C.W., M.-H.C.) extracted relevant data from each selected trial and entered them into predefined databases. Divergences were resolved by discussion. If the included studies did not report data on primary or secondary outcomes, the corresponding authors were contacted for further information. The following data were extracted from each trial: author, publication year, study setting, patient characteristics, sample size, orthopedic procedures, dosage of vitamin C, incidence of CRPS I, functional outcomes, intensity of pain, and adverse events.

Primary outcome, secondary outcomes, and definitions

Clinical outcomes of the present meta-analysis were defined as those after a follow-up of 3–12 months. The primary endpoint was the impact of vitamin C supplementation on the functional outcomes following bone injury or orthopedic procedures, while the secondary outcomes included the risk of CRPS I, pain score, and risk of overall complications. The definition of functional outcomes and criteria for CRPS I were defined according to the criteria of each study.

Assessment of risk of bias for included studies

Two authors (M.-H.C., Y.-J.C.) assessed the risk of bias for each trial using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions²⁷. Disagreements were solved by discussion. The overall risk of bias of all included studies and the risk of bias of individual studies were analyzed. We rated the potential risk of bias by applying a rating of "low", "high," or "unclear" to each trial.

Statistical analysis

Instead of using the fixed model, a random effects model was adopted to calculate the risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes taking into account probable study heterogeneity arising from differences in investigators and settings. Pooling of dichotomous data and computation of pooled RRs with 95% CIs was achieved by the Mantel–Haenszel (MH) method. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to express the selected effect size for continuous outcome. Assessment of heterogeneity (low: < 50%; moderate to high: 50% to 75%; high: > 75%) was attained by the application of I² statistics. To identify the possible influence of a single study on the overall results, sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of a single clinical trial on the overall findings by deleting one study at a time from the meta-analysis. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted based on the indications for the procedures (i.e., fracture subgroup vs. non-fracture subgroup). We used funnel plots to assess the potentials of publication and reporting bias if ten or more studies were available for the analysis of a particular outcome. The result was considered significant for a probability value (p) less than 0.05 for all analyses. For data synthesis, we utilized the Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan 5.4; Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014).

Results

Study selection

A flowchart summarizing the reasons for study exclusion according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as well as an illustration of the full electronic search strategy using the Medline database are shown in Fig. 1 and Supplemental Fig. 1, respectively. Of a total of 1,011 potentially eligible trials identified from the databases, 166 were removed due to duplication and 821 records were excluded after reviewing their titles and abstracts. Of the remaining 24 studies deemed eligible with the full text surveyed, 17 studies were deleted because of non-RCT studies (n = 9), no available outcomes (n = 2), irrelevance (n = 2), availability of merely an abstract (n = 1), shortage of numerical data (n = 2), and non-English publication (n = 1). Overall, seven RCTs in total were included in the present meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Characteristics of included studies

Seven RCTs including 1,361 participants published between 1999 and 2021 were analyzed^{28,29,30,31,32,33,34}. The study characteristics are described in Table 1. Vitamin C was given orally in all trials^{28,29,30,31,32,33} with a duration ranging from 40 to 55 days. The dosage of vitamin C was 1000 mg daily in three studies^28,30,34 and 500 mg daily in three trials^29,31,33, while one study compared the effects of three different daily doses (i.e., 200, 500, 1000 mg)³². The follow-up was 12 months in six studies^{28,29,31,32,33,34} and 12 weeks in the other study³⁰. Three studies focused on patients with wrist fracture^29,32,33, while the other four investigated patients with total knee replacement (n = 2)^28,34, foot and ankle trauma (n = 1)³⁰, and lumbar spine surgery (n = 1)³¹, respectively. For a study that divided patients with a wrist fracture into displaced and non-displaced sub-group²⁹, we separated the two groups for convenience of statistical analysis. According to the indications for the procedures, subgroup analysis was performed on the seven studies included in the current meta-analysis that were divided into the fracture (i.e., three studies on wrist fracture^29,32,33 and one study on ankle fracture³⁰) and non-fracture (i.e., one study on lumbar spine stenosis³¹ and two studies on total knee arthroplasty^28,34) subgroups.

Table. 1 Characteristics of included studies (n = 7).

Full size table

Risk of bias assessment

The risks of bias of individual studies are summarized in Fig. 2. All included studies were found to give sufficient details about randomization and were assigned a low risk of allocation bias^{28,29,30,31,32,33,34}. The risk of performance bias of three trials was considered low because both participants and investigators were blinded to the treatment (e.g., all capsules had the same appearance and taste)^30,32,33. Other risks of bias including attrition bias, measurement bias, reporting bias, and overall bias were also regarded as low in most studies.

Improvement in functional outcomes at 3–6 months

Three studies recruiting a total of 486 patients (vitamin group, n = 242 vs. placebo group, n = 244) were eligible for the analysis^29,30,31. A forest plot demonstrated no significant difference in functional outcomes at 3–6 months between both groups (SMD = − 0.40, 95% CI − 0.91 to 0.12, p = 0.13; I² = 87%) (Fig. 3). Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between the fracture and non-fracture subgroups (p = 0.95). Omitting certain trials also did not significantly impact the outcomes on sensitivity analysis.

Improvement in functional outcomes at 6–12 months

Three studies with a total of 467 patients (vitamin group, n = 234 vs. placebo group, n = 233) were available for the analysis^28,29,31. Inspection of the forest plot revealed no significant difference in functional outcomes at 6–12 months between both groups (SMD = − 0.00, 95%: CI − 0.19 to 0.18, p = 0.97; I²= 0%) (Fig. 4). No significant difference between fracture and non-fracture subgroups was noted on subgroup analysis (p = 0.46). In addition, sensitivity analysis did not show significant impact on outcome by omitting certain trials.

Risk of CRPS I at follow-up of 12 months in patients receiving oral vitamin C regardless of dosage

Five studies involving a total of 1,143 patients (vitamin group, n = 687 vs. placebo group, n = 456) contained information for CRPS I risk assessment^{29,30,32,33,34}. The definition of 'CRPS I' varied across the included studies (Table 1). The dosage of vitamin C varied from 200 to 1500 mg (Table 1). Pooled analysis showed that the risk of CRPS I was lower in patients with vitamin C treatment compared to those without (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.85, p = 0.01; I² = 47%) (Fig. 5). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between the fracture and non-fracture subgroups (p = 0.43). However, inconsistency of outcome was noted on sensitivity analysis when three trials were removed one at a time^32,33,34.

Risk of CRPS I at follow-up of 12 months in patients receiving oral vitamin C ≥ 500 mg daily

Five studies with a total of 1,047 patients (vitamin group, n = 591 vs. placebo group, n = 456) were available for the analysis of risk of CRPS I in patients receiving vitamin C ≥ 500 mg daily^{29,30,32,33,34}. The dosage of vitamin C varied from 500 to 1500 mg (Table 1). Consistent the overall outcome regardless of dosage, pooled analysis also demonstrated a reduced risk of CRPS I in patients with relatively high-dose vitamin C supplementation compared to those without (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.89, p = 0.02; I² = 54%) (Fig. 6). Subgroup analysis of the fracture and non-fracture subgroups demonstrated no significant difference (p = 0.5). On the other hand, sensitivity analysis showed an inconsistent outcome when three trials^32,33,34 were removed one at a time.

Severity of pain 3–6 months after surgery or trauma

Three studies enrolling a total of 486 patients (vitamin group, n = 242 vs. placebo group, n = 244) provided data on pain severity for the analysis^29,30,31. A forest plot demonstrated no significant difference in mean pain score at 3–6 months in the vitamin C group compared with that in the placebo group (SMD = − 0.18, 95% CI − 0.49 to 0.12, p = 0.25; I² = 64%) (Supplemental Fig. 2). Subgroup analysis between the fracture and non-fracture subgroups revealed no significant difference (p = 0.93). Besides, sensitivity analysis gave no evidence of a significant impact on outcome by omitting certain trials.

Overall complications at 3–6 months after surgery or trauma

Two studies involving a total of 426 patients (vitamin group, n = 212 vs. placebo group, n = 214) reported the incidences of complications for the analysis^29,31. The pooled RR of complications at 3–6 months was 0.98 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.39, p = 0.89, I² = 0%) (Supplemental Fig. 3). The findings showed no significant association between the use of oral vitamin C supplementation and the risk of complications following surgery or trauma. Comparison between the fracture and non-fracture subgroups also demonstrated no significant difference on subgroup analysis (p = 0.77).

Discussion

Despite the potential therapeutic effects of oral vitamin C supplementation on osteoporosis, bone mineral density, and physical performance^35,36, our findings demonstrated no significant differences in the functional outcomes, pain score, and overall complications between patients with oral vitamin C supplementation and those without following orthopedic procedures. In addition, although previous meta-analyses reported that vitamin C supplementation may decrease the risk of CRPS I^21,22,24,25, results from the other authors did not share the same conclusion²³. With the incorporation of the latest data, our study showed a lower risk of CRPS I in patients with oral vitamin C treatment compared to those without.

In a meta-analysis of observational studies, an increased dietary vitamin C intake was associated with a lower risk of hip fracture and osteoporosis as well as a higher bone mineral density at femoral neck and lumbar spine³⁵. In addition, recent studies suggested a positive correlation between vitamin C intake and physical performance in the elderly³⁷. Consistently, another study examining the relationship between antioxidant vitamin intake (e.g., vitamin C, vitamin E, retinol, and β-carotene) and physical performance in the elderly demonstrated significant positive correlations between most antioxidants, particularly vitamin C, and a higher skeletal muscular strength (e.g., knee extension) and physical performance³⁶. Because muscle strength recovery is a key factor affecting the functional outcome of post-fracture patients^38,39,40, vitamin C may have a role to play in reinforcing functional recovery after fracture. Nevertheless, the current study did not show evidence supportive of this hypothesis.

CRPS I, which is an uncommon complication of orthopedic surgery with a female predominance, has an incidence of 10.1–22.2%^32,33. CPRS I is characterized by unexplained pain, edema, swelling, sudomotor and motor dysfunctions (e.g., vasomotor instability) and loss of joint mobility. Early treatment is critical for a good prognosis⁴¹. Previous clinical and animal studies have demonstrated a reduced incidence of CRPS I after trauma and surgery through the oral vitamin C administration^29,42,43. In concert with this finding, although a number of meta-analyses reported a decreased risk of CRPS I following orthopedic procedures after the use of vitamin C^21,22,24,25, other meta-analyses did not share the same findings²³. Therefore, the association between vitamin C supplementation and the risk of CRPS remains unclear.

The limitations of previous meta-analyses investigating the correlation between oral vitamin C supplementation and the risk of CRPS I are summarized in supplemental Table 1. For instance, one meta-analysis²² included only one RCT⁴⁴ and two non-RCT studies^42,45 without incorporating the results of some RCTs^29,33. Although another meta-analysis focused on RCTs²¹, the included trials involved patients subjected to different forms of treatment (i.e., conservative³³ vs. conservative or surgery^29,32), inclusion and exclusion criteria, and criteria for diagnosing CRPS I. Despite the finding of an association between oral vitamin C supplementation and a decreased risk of CRPS I²¹, the application of fixed effects model based on the assumption of homogeneity of the included trials sampled from the same population⁴⁶ instead of random effects model in that study may have biased their results. In contrast, using the random effects model and evidence from the latest studies, our investigation demonstrated a significant positive association between oral vitamin C supplementation and a reduced risk of CRPS I. However, the inconsistent outcome of sensitivity analysis implicated a lack of robustness of the results that warrant further large-scale clinical studies for elucidation.

Patients who are severely injured or after major surgeries are subject to a high level of systemic stress that causes an excessive production of ROS and a significant consumption of endogenous antioxidants^7,47. Such an imbalance between ROS generation and antioxidant reinforcement perpetuates the oxidative stress, resulting in reduction/oxidation (redox) dysregulation, cellular perturbation, organ dysfunction, and systemic disorders⁷. A retrospective study on 4,294 trauma patients demonstrated that the implementation of a high-dose antioxidant protocol including intravenous vitamin C (1000 mg every eight hours) was associated with a reduced incidence of respiratory failure, surgical site infections, abdominal wall complications, and overall infectious complications⁴⁷. Consistently, a previous meta-analysis on a total of 19 RCTs involving 2,008 patients showed a significant decrease in the incidence of atrial fibrillation, ventilation time, length of ICU and hospital stay in those receiving intravenous or oral vitamin C supplementation⁴⁸. Nevertheless, the pooled RR of complications at 3–6 months in the current study was 0.98 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.39, p = 0.89, I² = 0%) (supplemental Fig. 3), indicating that the use of vitamin C was not associated with a lower risk of complications. The difference in findings between the present investigation and previous studies may be partly explained by the variations in patients' condition, the magnitude of surgeries, the surgical techniques, and the incidence of inflammation and ischemia/reperfusion injury that the patients experienced⁷. Therefore, the inclusion of trials on relatively minor procedures in patients without major trauma or hemodynamic instability in the current meta-analysis may contribute to the lack of significant benefit of oral vitamin C supplementation in terms of reduction in postoperative complications. Additionally, in contrast to the current investigation that pinpointed the therapeutic benefit of oral vitamin C supplements, previous studies investigated patients receiving either pure intravenous⁴⁷ or mixed intravenous and oral⁴⁸ vitamin C. As intravenous vitamin C administration can achieve a circulating concentration up to 70-fold higher than that through the oral route at the maximum tolerable dose⁴⁹, the lack of effectiveness of oral vitamin C is possible in this clinical setting.

The current meta-analysis had its limitations that need to be taken into account for accurate interpretation of its findings. First, our study included a relatively small number of RCTs on patients receiving different orthopedic procedures. Second, we only investigated the effects of oral vitamin C supplementation on the prevention rather than the treatment of CRPS I because there was no study on the latter. Third, review of the included trials of the present study²⁹ revealed that the incidence of CRPS I appeared to vary with the time after surgery; the incidence at postoperative 6 weeks was higher than that at one year. Therefore, the choice of postoperative 12 months as the time of outcome assessment in the current study may result in underestimation of the beneficial effect of vitamin C. Nevertheless, only one of the included studies provided the incidence of CRPS I at three months after procedures so that the short-term effectiveness of vitamin C supplementation could not be assessed. Fourth, although CRPS I mostly affects women⁵⁰, all five of our included trials recruited males who may have biased the findings. Finally, there are different criteria for the diagnosis of CRPS I (e.g., Budapest, Atkins and Veldman criteria)⁵¹. Of the five studies addressing CRPS I in the present study, two adopted the Veldman criteria, one used the Atkins criteria, and one applied the Budapest criteria. Hence, the small number of studies and the different criteria used may potentially bias our results.

In conclusion, our systematic review of clinical trials investigating the effects of oral vitamin C supplementation on recovery in patients after orthopedic procedures demonstrated no significant impact of vitamin C on the functional outcomes at 3–6 months or 6–12 months, the risk of overall complications and the severity of pain at 3–6 months after orthopedic procedures. However, patients with oral vitamin C supplementation regardless of dosage had a lower risk of CRPS I on follow-up at 12 months compared to that in those without. Nevertheless, the small number of randomized clinical trials included in this study warrants further large-scale studies to support our findings.

References

1.
Moris, D. et al. The role of reactive oxygen species in myocardial redox signaling and regulation. Ann. Transl. Med. 5, 324 (2017).

PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
2.
Zhou, T., Chuang, C. C. & Zuo, L. Molecular characterization of reactive oxygen species in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 864946 (2015).

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
3.
Winyard, P. G., Moody, C. J. & Jacob, C. Oxidative activation of antioxidant defence. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 453–461 (2005).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
4.
Zhou, Y.-Q. et al. Reactive oxygen species scavengers ameliorate mechanical allodynia in a rat model of cancer-induced bone pain. Redox. Biol. 14, 391–397 (2018).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
5.
Meeus, M., Nijs, J., Hermans, L., Goubert, D. & Calders, P. The role of mitochondrial dysfunctions due to oxidative and nitrosative stress in the chronic pain or chronic fatigue syndromes and fibromyalgia patients: peripheral and central mechanisms as therapeutic targets?. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 17, 1081–1089 (2013).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
6.
Baykal, T., Seferoglu, B., Karsan, O., Kiziltunc, A. & Senel, K. Antioxidant profile in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 17, 156–158 (2014).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
7.
Stevens, J. L., Feelisch, M. & Martin, D. S. Perioperative oxidative stress: The unseen enemy. Anesth. Analg. 129, 1749–1760 (2019).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
8.
Banfi, G., Iorio, E. L. & Corsi, M. M. Oxidative stress, free radicals and bone remodeling. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 46, 1550–1555 (2008).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
9.
Sandukji, A., Al-Sawaf, H., Mohamadin, A., Alrashidi, Y. & Sheweita, S. Oxidative stress and bone markers in plasma of patients with long-bone fixative surgery: role of antioxidants. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 30, 435–442 (2011).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
10.
Pansarasa, O. et al. Age and sex differences in human skeletal muscle: role of reactive oxygen species. Free Radic. Res. 33, 287–293 (2000).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
11.
Lewis, L. N. et al. Lower dietary and circulating vitamin C in middle- and older-aged men and women are associated with lower estimated skeletal muscle mass. J. Nutr. 150, 2789–2798 (2020).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
12.
Aghajanian, P., Hall, S., Wongworawat, M. D. & Mohan, S. The roles and mechanisms of actions of vitamin C in bone: new developments. J. Bone Miner. Res. 30, 1945–1955 (2015).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
13.
Sorice, A. et al. Ascorbic acid: its role in immune system and chronic inflammation diseases. Mini. Rev. Med. Chem. 14, 444–452 (2014).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
14.
Sugimoto, M. et al. Impaired expression of noncollagenous bone matrix protein mRNAs during fracture healing in ascorbic acid-deficient rats. J. Bone Miner. Res. 13, 271–278 (1998).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
15.
Zhang, Z. M., Jiang, L. S., Jiang, S. D. & Dai, L. Y. Osteogenic potential and responsiveness to leptin of mesenchymal stem cells between postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J. Orthop. Res. 27, 1067–1073 (2009).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
16.
Alcantara-Martos, T., Delgado-Martinez, A. D., Vega, M. V., Carrascal, M. T. & Munuera-Martinez, L. Effect of vitamin C on fracture healing in elderly osteogenic disorder shionogi rats. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 89, 402–407 (2007).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
17.
Sahni, S. et al. High vitamin C intake is associated with lower 4-year bone loss in elderly men. J. Nutr. 138, 1931–1938 (2008).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
18.
Leveille, S. G. et al. Dietary vitamin C and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women in Washington State, USA. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 51, 479–485 (1997).

CAS Article Google Scholar
19.
Hall, S. L. & Greendale, G. A. The relation of dietary vitamin C intake to bone mineral density: results from the PEPI study. Calcif. Tissue Int. 63, 183–189 (1998).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
20.
Brzezińska, O., Łukasik, Z., Makowska, J. & Walczak, K. Role of vitamin C in osteoporosis development and treatment-a literature review. Nutrients 12, 2394 (2020).

PubMed Central Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
21.
Aïm, F., Klouche, S., Frison, A., Bauer, T. & Hardy, P. Efficacy of vitamin C in preventing complex regional pain syndrome after wrist fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 103, 465–470 (2017).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
22.
Chen, S., Roffey, D. M., Dion, C. A., Arab, A. & Wai, E. K. Effect of perioperative vitamin C supplementation on postoperative pain and the incidence of chronic regional pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. J. Pain. 32, 179–185 (2016).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
23.
Evaniew, N., McCarthy, C., Kleinlugtenbelt, Y. V., Ghert, M. & Bhandari, M. Vitamin C to prevent complex regional pain syndrome in patients with distal radius fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Orthop. Trauma 29, e235-241 (2015).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
24.
Meena, S., Sharma, P., Gangary, S. K. & Chowdhury, B. Role of vitamin C in prevention of complex regional pain syndrome after distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 25, 637–641 (2015).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
25.
Shibuya, N., Humphers, J. M., Agarwal, M. R. & Jupiter, D. C. Efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin C on complex regional pain syndrome in extremity trauma and surgery–systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 52, 62–66 (2013).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
26.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339, b2535 (2009).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
27.
Higgins, J. P. et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343, d5928 (2011).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
28.
Behrend, H. et al. Vitamin C demand is increased after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind placebo-controlled-randomized study. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 27, 1182–1188 (2019).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
29.
Ekrol, I., Duckworth, A. D., Ralston, S. H., Court-Brown, C. M. & McQueen, M. M. The influence of vitamin C on the outcome of distal radial fractures: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96, 1451–1459 (2014).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
30.
Jain, S. K., Dar, M. Y., Kumar, S., Yadav, A. & Kearns, S. R. Role of anti-oxidant (vitamin-C) in post-operative pain relief in foot and ankle trauma surgery: A prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Surg. 25, 542–545 (2019).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
31.
Lee, G. W., Yang, H. S., Yeom, J. S. & Ahn, M. W. The efficacy of vitamin C on postoperative outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 9, 317–324 (2017).

PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
32.
Zollinger, P. E., Tuinebreijer, W. E., Breederveld, R. S. & Kreis, R. W. Can vitamin C prevent complex regional pain syndrome in patients with wrist fractures? A randomized, controlled, multicenter dose-response study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89, 1424–1431 (2007).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
33.
Zollinger, P. E., Tuinebreijer, W. E., Kreis, R. W. & Breederveld, R. S. Effect of vitamin C on frequency of reflex sympathetic dystrophy in wrist fractures: a randomised trial. Lancet 354, 2025–2028 (1999).

CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
34.
Jacques, H. et al. Prospective randomized study of the vitamin C effect on pain and complex pain regional syndrome after total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2021 Feb 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04981-y. Online ahead of print.
35.
Malmir, H., Shab-Bidar, S. F& Djafarian, K. Vitamin C intake in relation to bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture and osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Br. J. Nutr. 119, 847–858 (2018).
36.
Cesari, M. et al. Antioxidants and physical performance in elderly persons: the Invecchiare in Chianti (InCHIANTI) study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79, 289–294 (2004).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
37.
Saito, K. et al. A significant relationship between plasma vitamin C concentration and physical performance among Japanese elderly women. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences 67, 295–301 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar
38.
Dickinson, W. H., Duwelius, P. J. & Colville, M. R. Muscle strength testing following surgery for acetabular fractures. J. Orthop. Trauma 7, 39–46 (1993).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
39.
Borrelli, J. Jr., Ricci, W. M., Anglen, J. O., Gregush, R. & Engsberg, J. Muscle strength recovery and its effects on outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures. J. Orthop. Trauma 20, 388–395 (2006).

PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
40.
Borrelli, J. Jr., Goldfarb, C., Ricci, W., Wagner, J. M. & Engsberg, J. R. Functional outcome after isolated acetabular fractures. J. Orthop. Trauma 16, 73–81 (2002).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
41.
Veldman, P. H., Reynen, H. M., Arntz, I. E. & Goris, R. J. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet 342, 1012–1016 (1993).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
42.
Besse, J. L., Gadeyne, S., Galand-Desmé, S., Lerat, J. L. & Moyen, B. Effect of vitamin C on prevention of complex regional pain syndrome type I in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg 15, 179–182 (2009).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
43.
Guo, T.-Z., Wei, T., Huang, T.-T., Kingery, W. S. & Clark, J. D. Oxidative stress contributes to fracture/cast-induced inflammation and pain in a rat model of complex regional pain syndrome. J. Pain 19, 1147–1156 (2018).

CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
44.
Zollinger, P. E. et al. No higher risk of CRPS after external fixation of distal radial fractures-subgroup analysis under randomised vitamin C prophylaxis. Open Orthop. J. 4, 71–75 (2010).

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
45.
Cazeneuve, J. F., Leborgne, J. M., Kermad, K. & Hassan, Y. Vitamin C and prevention of reflex sympathetic dystrophy following surgical management of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop. Belg 68, 481–484 (2002).

CAS PubMed Google Scholar
46.
Erez, A., Bloom, M. C. & Wells, M. T. Using random rather than fixed effects models in meta-analysis: Implications for situational specificity and validity generalization. Pers. Psychol. 49, 275–306 (1996).

Article Google Scholar
47.
Giladi, A. M., Dossett, L. A., Fleming, S. B., Abumrad, N. N. & Cotton, B. A. High-dose antioxidant administration is associated with a reduction in post-injury complications in critically ill trauma patients. Injury 42, 78–82 (2011).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
48.
Hill, A. et al. Effects of vitamin C on organ function in cardiac surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 11, 2103 (2019).

CAS PubMed Central Article PubMed Google Scholar
49.
Padayatty, S. J. et al. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics: implications for oral and intravenous use. Ann. Intern Med. 140, 533–537 (2004).

CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
50.
Rewhorn, M. J., Leung, A. H., Gillespie, A., Moir, J. S. & Miller, R. Incidence of complex regional pain syndrome after foot and ankle surgery. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 53, 256–258 (2014).

PubMed Article Google Scholar
51.
Bean, D. J., Johnson, M. H. & Kydd, R. R. The outcome of complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a systematic review. J. Pain 15, 677–690 (2014).

PubMed Article Google Scholar

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Author notes

These authors contributed equally: Kee-Hsin Chen and Cheuk-Kwan Sun.

Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan

Kuo-Chuan Hung, Ying-Jen Chang, Chun-Ning Ho, Li-Kai Wang & Jen-Yin Chen
Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan

Kuo-Chuan Hung & Li-Kai Wang
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Min-Hsien Chiang & Shao-Chun Wu
College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City, Taiwan

Ying-Jen Chang
Post-Baccalaureate Program in Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Kee-Hsin Chen
Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Kee-Hsin Chen
Center for Nursing and Healthcare Research in Clinical Practice Application, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Kee-Hsin Chen
Evidence-Based Knowledge Translation Center, Department of Nursing, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Kee-Hsin Chen
Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, No.1, Yida Road, Jiaosu Village, Yanchao District, Kaohsiung City, 82445, Taiwan

Cheuk-Kwan Sun
College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Cheuk-Kwan Sun

Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-C.H. and M.-H.C.; methodology, C.-N.H.; software, K.-H.C.; validation, L.-K.W. and J.-Y.C.; formal analysis, Y.-J.C.; investigation, S.-C.W.; resources, S.-C.W.; data curation, K.-C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.-C.H.; writing—review and editing, K.-C.H., M.-H.C. and C.-K.S.; visualization, M.-H.C.; supervision, C.-K.S.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheuk-Kwan Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hung, KC., Chiang, MH., Wu, SC. et al. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the impact of oral vitamin C supplementation on first-year outcomes in orthopedic patients. Sci Rep 11, 9225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88864-7

Download citation

Received: 31 January 2021
Accepted: 16 April 2021
Published: 29 April 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88864-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Is Vitamin C Good For Bone Healing

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-88864-7

Is Vitamin C Good For Bone Healing

Alvin Desember 05, 2021